Lever

Privacy

3 October 2026. Free personal project, not a company.

Who

Lever is run by Ted Kondi, a private person in Italy. There is no company and no VAT number. He is the data controller. You can reach him on X as @tuxtedi, or on the LinkedIn profile below.

Ted Kondi on LinkedIn

What

Account name, email, and the Google or X identifier used to sign in. The journal you write: goals, tasks, notes, mood, sleep, gratitude, rewards, and photos you attach. Short safety copies of that journal. A session cookie, plus IP address and browser type on the session. Language and appearance stay only in this browser.

Why

To keep your journal and let you sign in. Safety copies exist so a bad save does not wipe the journal. That is the contract of using Lever, plus a limited interest in not losing your data by accident. Nothing is sold and there is no advertising.

Who else

Google or X, only to sign you in. The host that stores the database so the journal survives a new phone. No other company receives the journal.

How long

The journal stays until you delete the account. Safety keeps at most 40 copies and 80 short log lines, then drops the oldest. Emptying the journal leaves those copies until you delete the account. This browser's last-good copy is removed with the account.

Your rights

You can export the journal, edit it, empty it, or delete the account from Settings. You can also complain to the Garante per la protezione dei dati personali in Italy. Write to Ted Kondi on X (@tuxtedi) or LinkedIn to access or correct something the app does not show.

Cookies

Only a session cookie, required to stay signed in. No analytics and no advertising cookies, so there is no consent banner. Language and appearance are stored in this browser, not sent as a cookie.

Children

Lever is not for children under 16.

The product

The software, texts, and design of Lever are © 2026 Ted Kondi. All rights reserved. Using Lever does not give a licence to copy the product, the code, or the design. A free software licence would do the opposite: it would allow others to copy the code. An idea or a method cannot be locked that way.

Back